Well, I made my escape to New Jersey 25 years ago when the real estate bubble in the mid-'80s kicked me out of NYC. And, after building a studio from scratch in the middle of the ghetto, I have enjoyed the personal freedom it afforded. I got off the obscene rent treadmill and have been painting all those years. Maybe it was dumb luck and timing, but I'm also old now and I haven't even "emerged" yet, and probably never will.
The past year has been torture because of reading too many blogs telling me painting is untenable (not dead, merely untenable, which is infinitely worse) given that the world as we know it is on the brink of dissolution. PL: you are so articulate and intelligently opinionated and I admire almost everything you write, but I can't stop making paintings because it is what I do better than anything else. And yes, I am cluttering up the world with more objects that no one (not even a rich person) is buying. But, painting is my way of learning about the universe. I am even guilty of "borrowing" my 4-yr old neighbor for afternoons to paint with me. I am wary of politics and not an activist and feel somewhat remiss for being so insular. But I look forward to reading others' responses because you've opened up a can o'worms here.
Well.....the first thing that comes to mind.....actually, for me.....the only thing (all the other things pale by comparison)...is.... It cracks me up that something touted to be so innovative ( uh....art?) has vultures and magpies and crows flying round the world declaring "rules" of art. Cavemen had no dealers and did not sell their art for high prices ( did they get some meat off a bone?) but did their thing because.... well, we don't know, do we? But we can guess and guess we do.....and rules we make.... and the rules and the critique have become more important than the art, haven't they?????? I often think that we should throw the art down the toilet and put the artists in the museum. Aren't they what really counts? Over and over, they can create out of nothing and produce infinite variation ( and often garbage as well...but that's ok). My excorciser is coming over to make me stop. The devil is making me say all of these things, I'm sure. Danonymous Once in a while (every 5-10 years) I need to experience a personal rant. Thanks. It's over.
Whoa, people! I'm not knocking painting or painters. Didn't I make it clear that I'm a painter, too?
What I've noticed, though, is that 'needing to paint' has created a whole host of other circumstances in my life which are valuable and can potentially be shared. It's taught me how to live on almost nothing, how to transform ugly places into beautiful ones, and how to heal myself and others.
It caused me to move to another country for a few years, and the lessons I learned from that are priceless. It's both the cause and (some of) the substance of my blogging.
I think my overarching point is that it's not just the absence of any kind of meaningful *art* experience that the world loses when museums become playgrounds for the rich and moronic; it's the distillation of all kinds of substantive experience and wisdom that is marginalized.
"...it's not just the absence of any kind of meaningful *art* experience that the world loses ...it's the distillation of all kinds of substantive experience and wisdom that is marginalized."
Truer words were never written. Of course you are right, and I am just a bit touchy these days when the institutions (including the schools) to which I ought to feel allegiance as an artist are so polluted by fashion, branding, cult of the personality (and I'm talking curators & directors here) and commerce, that I am left with no place to go. But as you have suggested here and in your previous post, there are alternative communities where that "substantive experience" will thrive. It's so easy to become depressed by the influence of those who populate the "playgrounds for the rich and moronic" . Thanks PL
Unfortunately an artists work often does not have meaning to the jet set until a big price tag is involved. You get clowns, including that pretentious Winkie, who try to masturbate the idea of the value of art having worth, but at heart those like him still only honor artists who can make them a cold hard buck. Or replace the b with an f if the artist is pretty and young enough.
At any set time you have only around 100 living artists who are allowed any stock in in contemporary dialogue on art. You can't tell me that out of millions of artists there are only a hundred or so that speak well visually and deserve the wealth those few have earned.
I swear there should be tax breaks for galleries that represent at least a handful of "discovered" artists a year instead of showcasing the same tired art. On the same note public funded art spaces and art museums should have to show works by those outside of the mainstream at least a few times a year.
I know artists who say so much about our times through their work and sadly that vision will never be shared outside of random posts online because the powers that be are so scared of the public choosing the next great artists over them.
The art world has never really been good at focusing on the hear and now. It is a stubborn mess and it is all about people with delusions of power keeping that grip over a culture that they think only they have the ability to define.
I honestly think artists need to start protesting outside of galleries and museums so that finally their work can be seen.
Darlings, where to start? Sometimes I feel as though I have lived a thousand lives in this one, dewy and unlined though my complexion may be. To Tell All may be to intimidate; thus I maintain, at most times, a discreet reserve. But here I share my musings, perhaps revealing the secret to my exquisite poise and charm.
8 comments:
Er, but I do make art out of intense personal (and spiritual) necessity. Is that... still... good? Ish?
*slinks away to garret*
Well, I made my escape to New Jersey 25 years ago when the real estate bubble in the mid-'80s kicked me out of NYC. And, after building a studio from scratch in the middle of the ghetto, I have enjoyed the personal freedom it afforded. I got off the obscene rent treadmill and have been painting all those years. Maybe it was dumb luck and timing, but I'm also old now and I haven't even "emerged" yet, and probably never will.
The past year has been torture because of reading too many blogs telling me painting is untenable (not dead, merely untenable, which is infinitely worse) given that the world as we know it is on the brink of dissolution. PL: you are so articulate and intelligently opinionated and I admire almost everything you write, but I can't stop making paintings because it is what I do better than anything else. And yes, I am cluttering up the world with more objects that no one (not even a rich person) is buying. But, painting is my way of learning about the universe. I am even guilty of "borrowing" my 4-yr old neighbor for afternoons to paint with me. I am wary of politics and not an activist and feel somewhat remiss for being so insular. But I look forward to reading others' responses because you've opened up a can o'worms here.
Well.....the first thing that comes to mind.....actually, for me.....the only thing (all the other things pale by comparison)...is.... It cracks me up that something touted to be so innovative ( uh....art?) has vultures and magpies and crows flying round the world declaring "rules" of art.
Cavemen had no dealers and did not sell their art for high prices ( did they get some meat off a bone?) but did their thing because.... well, we don't know, do we? But we can guess and guess we do.....and rules we make.... and the rules and the critique have become more important than the art, haven't they?????? I often think that we should throw the art down the toilet and put the artists in the museum. Aren't they what really counts? Over and over, they can create out of nothing and produce infinite variation ( and often garbage as well...but that's ok).
My excorciser is coming over to make me stop. The devil is making me say all of these things, I'm sure.
Danonymous
Once in a while (every 5-10 years) I need to experience a personal rant. Thanks. It's over.
Whoa, people! I'm not knocking painting or painters. Didn't I make it clear that I'm a painter, too?
What I've noticed, though, is that 'needing to paint' has created a whole host of other circumstances in my life which are valuable and can potentially be shared. It's taught me how to live on almost nothing, how to transform ugly places into beautiful ones, and how to heal myself and others.
It caused me to move to another country for a few years, and the lessons I learned from that are priceless. It's both the cause and (some of) the substance of my blogging.
I think my overarching point is that it's not just the absence of any kind of meaningful *art* experience that the world loses when museums become playgrounds for the rich and moronic; it's the distillation of all kinds of substantive experience and wisdom that is marginalized.
And Danny, I think that's what I said--put the artists in the museums.
"...it's not just the absence of any kind of meaningful *art* experience that the world loses ...it's the distillation of all kinds of substantive experience and wisdom that is marginalized."
Truer words were never written. Of course you are right, and I am just a bit touchy these days when the institutions (including the schools) to which I ought to feel allegiance as an artist are so polluted by fashion, branding, cult of the personality (and I'm talking curators & directors here) and commerce, that I am left with no place to go. But as you have suggested here and in your previous post, there are alternative communities where that "substantive experience" will thrive. It's so easy to become depressed by the influence of those who populate the "playgrounds for the rich and moronic" . Thanks PL
Unfortunately an artists work often does not have meaning to the jet set until a big price tag is involved. You get clowns, including that pretentious Winkie, who try to masturbate the idea of the value of art having worth, but at heart those like him still only honor artists who can make them a cold hard buck. Or replace the b with an f if the artist is pretty and young enough.
At any set time you have only around 100 living artists who are allowed any stock in in contemporary dialogue on art. You can't tell me that out of millions of artists there are only a hundred or so that speak well visually and deserve the wealth those few have earned.
I swear there should be tax breaks for galleries that represent at least a handful of "discovered" artists a year instead of showcasing the same tired art. On the same note public funded art spaces and art museums should have to show works by those outside of the mainstream at least a few times a year.
I know artists who say so much about our times through their work and sadly that vision will never be shared outside of random posts online because the powers that be are so scared of the public choosing the next great artists over them.
The art world has never really been good at focusing on the hear and now. It is a stubborn mess and it is all about people with delusions of power keeping that grip over a culture that they think only they have the ability to define.
I honestly think artists need to start protesting outside of galleries and museums so that finally their work can be seen.
hello, this is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting in your blog especially its discussion. keep up the good work.
harmony
Post a Comment