There was an excellent, detailed, and lengthy article a few months ago in Vanity Fair, I think it was, which laid out the entire Madoff affair from start to finish, including interviews with his investors. It was basically a massive schadenfreudefest for someone like me -- I don't enjoy the misfortunes of others in general, but like most people, I imagine, I love it when the victims deserve it.
Typical unrestrained ignorant blog punditry coming up. You might want to avert your eyes.
Two things kept coming to mind while I read the article. The first was that Madoff clearly backed into his bad behavior. It seems he started out sincere and honest, eventually made some small mistake, and in attempting to cover for it made some more, and the whole thing eventually snowballed, like a Jackie Gleason routine from The Honeymooners only more painful and slow, until he finally found he'd doomed himself. I don't know if he's really sorry for anyone but himself, but I suspect not.
The other thing that kept coming to mind -- the main thing -- was that Madoff's investors gave him their money for one reason and one reason only: GREED. They wanted MORE. More than they could get through regular channels like savings accounts and mutual funds. It's not that they didn't know what Madoff was doing with their money: It's that they didn't care as long as he returned MORE.
I understand that a wealthy lifestyle comes with responsibilities and costs we normal people can't imagine. You can't just have a big yard: You need people to mow the big yard's lawn, and that costs money every month. And I understand that these expenses can accumulate slowly in what seems to be a reasonable fashion: You want a pool, so you put one in. Then someone needs to take care of the pool. Hell, I've experienced that myself. (I got rid of the pool.)
But all of that is beside the main problem, which is the problem of MORE. All of Madoff's investors could've put their fortunes in a regular old bank, or invested across a range of things, or otherwise parked their money some place safer. But then they wouldn't have gotten MORE.
They wanted MORE and now they have LESS. And that, to me, is a good thing. An excellent thing. The less they have the better. I would like to see them learn to appreciate that someone has left out flattened cardboard for them to sleep on under the bridge before they're allowed back into polite company.
Darlings, where to start? Sometimes I feel as though I have lived a thousand lives in this one, dewy and unlined though my complexion may be. To Tell All may be to intimidate; thus I maintain, at most times, a discreet reserve. But here I share my musings, perhaps revealing the secret to my exquisite poise and charm.
2 comments:
There was an excellent, detailed, and lengthy article a few months ago in Vanity Fair, I think it was, which laid out the entire Madoff affair from start to finish, including interviews with his investors. It was basically a massive schadenfreudefest for someone like me -- I don't enjoy the misfortunes of others in general, but like most people, I imagine, I love it when the victims deserve it.
Typical unrestrained ignorant blog punditry coming up. You might want to avert your eyes.
Two things kept coming to mind while I read the article. The first was that Madoff clearly backed into his bad behavior. It seems he started out sincere and honest, eventually made some small mistake, and in attempting to cover for it made some more, and the whole thing eventually snowballed, like a Jackie Gleason routine from The Honeymooners only more painful and slow, until he finally found he'd doomed himself. I don't know if he's really sorry for anyone but himself, but I suspect not.
The other thing that kept coming to mind -- the main thing -- was that Madoff's investors gave him their money for one reason and one reason only: GREED. They wanted MORE. More than they could get through regular channels like savings accounts and mutual funds. It's not that they didn't know what Madoff was doing with their money: It's that they didn't care as long as he returned MORE.
I understand that a wealthy lifestyle comes with responsibilities and costs we normal people can't imagine. You can't just have a big yard: You need people to mow the big yard's lawn, and that costs money every month. And I understand that these expenses can accumulate slowly in what seems to be a reasonable fashion: You want a pool, so you put one in. Then someone needs to take care of the pool. Hell, I've experienced that myself. (I got rid of the pool.)
But all of that is beside the main problem, which is the problem of MORE. All of Madoff's investors could've put their fortunes in a regular old bank, or invested across a range of things, or otherwise parked their money some place safer. But then they wouldn't have gotten MORE.
They wanted MORE and now they have LESS. And that, to me, is a good thing. An excellent thing. The less they have the better. I would like to see them learn to appreciate that someone has left out flattened cardboard for them to sleep on under the bridge before they're allowed back into polite company.
Now that's schadenfreude!
Very well put, PL.
Post a Comment