Now, see, that post is a perfect example of 'consistently interpreting other people's motives in the most negative light.' There is no such thing as 'the liberal mind,' in the way that it describes; liberalism is only an incidental factor of exhibitionistic emotionalism, not a core element of it. People tend to espouse ideas because of their experience; difference experiences generate different ideologies. People Act Out In Public largely on the basis of temperament + experience + maturity level, which equation changes gradually over time.
The issues they choose to espouse while acting out are very nearly random. You can find just as many 'conservative' provocateurs--if you count the wingnuts who like to shoot randomly at things and get into bar fights--as you can 'liberal minds' doing so.
I'm reminded of the early homeschooling days. We were very big on the importance of one's name, and the inappropriateness of name-calling (Proverbs enjoins "Put the scoffer out", scoffing having name-calling involved). We would banish the name-caller to the porch or their room for a period, then bring 'em back to discuss it. Maybe a lot of folks need a time-out for verbal rudeness.
Well said, and congratulations on Baby.(Just found out. 'Swhat I get for missing staff meetings.)
Yeah, DC. There's a difference between interpreting people negatively by reflex and interpreting them negatively because of experience.
Yeah Chris. After seventy years of communism in eastern Europe, fifty years of socialism in western Europe and fifty years of liberalism in the US, we have no experience whatsoever to look to, because it's *never really been tried yet*! Right?
Yup. We're just a bunch of frogs legs hooked to nine volt batteries over here on the right, we are.
if you count the wingnuts who like to shoot randomly at things
Cheap shot. You really mean to compare target shooting in the desert to masturbating on stage as a way of speaking truth to power?
And what, pray tell, is a Velociman? I want to smack him upside the head and I've only read a post and a half from him.
Not surprising, as his stated intention is to playfuly poke the eye of the perpetually peeved.
Heh. I daresay he gotcha. Such violent thoughts from a peaceful progressive!
Nonetheless he had a strong point in regards to the "unfathomable longing of the soul to vex itself". It can be the only reason I continue to wander back here from time to time. And it surely must go some way toward explaining Pretty Lady's ongoing rants against George W Bush.
You really mean to compare target shooting in the desert
Actually, DC, I was thinking of the frat guys at the University of Texas, who like to get hammered and drive through West Campus, shooting randomly at stop signs, traffic lights, and people who don't dress like they do. I had a friend who lost a kidney to such an incident.
Darlings, where to start? Sometimes I feel as though I have lived a thousand lives in this one, dewy and unlined though my complexion may be. To Tell All may be to intimidate; thus I maintain, at most times, a discreet reserve. But here I share my musings, perhaps revealing the secret to my exquisite poise and charm.
9 comments:
Now, see, that post is a perfect example of 'consistently interpreting other people's motives in the most negative light.' There is no such thing as 'the liberal mind,' in the way that it describes; liberalism is only an incidental factor of exhibitionistic emotionalism, not a core element of it. People tend to espouse ideas because of their experience; difference experiences generate different ideologies. People Act Out In Public largely on the basis of temperament + experience + maturity level, which equation changes gradually over time.
The issues they choose to espouse while acting out are very nearly random. You can find just as many 'conservative' provocateurs--if you count the wingnuts who like to shoot randomly at things and get into bar fights--as you can 'liberal minds' doing so.
And DC, don't bother to comment anonymously if you're going to link to my post; as you can see, the trackback will out you every time.
Now, see, that post is a perfect example of 'consistently interpreting other people's motives in the most negative light.'
Oh come now. Can you really scold like this, given your perspective on George W Bush?
YES.
Yeah, DC. There's a difference between interpreting people negatively by reflex and interpreting them negatively because of experience.
And what, pray tell, is a Velociman? I want to smack him upside the head and I've only read a post and a half from him.
I'm reminded of the early homeschooling days. We were very big on the importance of one's name, and the inappropriateness of name-calling (Proverbs enjoins "Put the scoffer out", scoffing having name-calling involved). We would banish the name-caller to the porch or their room for a period, then bring 'em back to discuss it. Maybe a lot of folks need a time-out for verbal rudeness.
Well said, and congratulations on Baby.(Just found out. 'Swhat I get for missing staff meetings.)
Be well!
Yeah, DC. There's a difference between interpreting people negatively by reflex and interpreting them negatively because of experience.
Yeah Chris. After seventy years of communism in eastern Europe, fifty years of socialism in western Europe and fifty years of liberalism in the US, we have no experience whatsoever to look to, because it's *never really been tried yet*! Right?
Yup. We're just a bunch of frogs legs hooked to nine volt batteries over here on the right, we are.
if you count the wingnuts who like to shoot randomly at things
Cheap shot. You really mean to compare target shooting in the desert to masturbating on stage as a way of speaking truth to power?
And what, pray tell, is a Velociman? I want to smack him upside the head and I've only read a post and a half from him.
Not surprising, as his stated intention is to playfuly poke the eye of the perpetually peeved.
Heh. I daresay he gotcha. Such violent thoughts from a peaceful progressive!
Nonetheless he had a strong point in regards to the "unfathomable longing of the soul to vex itself". It can be the only reason I continue to wander back here from time to time. And it surely must go some way toward explaining Pretty Lady's ongoing rants against George W Bush.
You really mean to compare target shooting in the desert
Actually, DC, I was thinking of the frat guys at the University of Texas, who like to get hammered and drive through West Campus, shooting randomly at stop signs, traffic lights, and people who don't dress like they do. I had a friend who lost a kidney to such an incident.
Post a Comment